Constitutional Court Decisions’ Effectiveness in Resolving Disputes Over Regional Election Results

Abstract

This study explores the role and effectiveness of the Constitutional Court (MK) in resolving disputes over Regional Head Election (Pilkada) results and its impact on local political stability and public trust. Based on an analysis of various cases decided by the MK, this research finds that the Court's rulings play a crucial role in ensuring justice and stability in the local democratic process. However, the acceptance of MK's decisions heavily depends on the quality of the decision-making process and the institution's independence from political influence. This study also examines the social implications of MK's rulings, particularly in terms of the relationship between local political elites and its influence on national policy. The findings of this research provide important insights into strengthening the role of the MK in maintaining the integrity of the democratic system in Indonesia.