The Role of The ATR/BPN Office in the Implementation of the Prohibition on Absentee Land Ownership (A Study in Mentaya Hilir Selatan Sub-District, Kotawaringin Timur Regency)

Authors

  • Nadya Amelia Putri Master of Notarial Law Student at Brawijaya University, Malang, Indonesia
  • Sukarmi Sukarmi Lecturer in the Faculty of Law, Brawijaya University, Malang, Indonesia
  • Endang Sri Kawuryan Lecturer in the Faculty of Law, Brawijaya University, Malang, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47814/jtc9wc84

Keywords:

Absentee Land Ownership; Land Office (ATR/BPN); Legal Effectiveness; Land Reform

Abstract

This study examines the implementation of the prohibition on absentee agricultural land ownership and the role of the Land Office (ATR/BPN) in Mentaya Hilir Selatan Sub-District, East Kotawaringin Regency, Central Kalimantan. Anchored in Article 10 of Law No. 5 of 1960 on the Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA), this prohibition is central to Indonesia's land-reform policy, yet faces persistent juridical and non-juridical obstacles. The research addresses two key questions: how the prohibition is implemented along with the challenges faced, and what measures the Land Office has taken to address them.Using an empirical legal (socio-legal) method combined with normative-juridical and statutory approaches, primary data were gathered through purposive-sampling interviews with the Head of the Land Office, three village heads, a land deed official (PPAT), and nine community members, analyzed descriptively. Results show ineffective implementation: operational mechanisms are limited to domicile verification at application and a rights-transfer statement when absentee land is identified, lacking post-registration monitoring.This ineffectiveness stems from outdated regulations and limited post-registration tracking (juridical), alongside weak inter-institutional coordination, minimal field supervision, low legal awareness, and entrenched kinship values tolerating cross-domicile control (non-juridical). Applying Soerjono Soekanto’s legal effectiveness theory, all five factors—law, enforcers, facilities, community, and culture—are simultaneously weak. John Rawls’ theory of justice further reveals a gap between formal administrative compliance and substantive fairness in land access.Resolving these issues requires regulatory evaluation and harmonization, alongside strengthened inter-institutional coordination, continuous data monitoring, and expanded, targeted public awareness campaigns. Integrating these legal and non-legal strategies can enhance implementation effectiveness, ensure legal certainty, and fulfill national land-reform goals of equitable agricultural land distribution.

References

Arisaputra, Muhammad Ilham. Reforma Agraria di Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2015.

Chomzah, H. Ali Achmad. Hukum Agraria (Pertanahan) Indonesia, Jilid I. Jakarta: Prestasi Pustakaraya, 2004.

Harsono, Boedi. Hukum Agraria Indonesia: Sejarah Pembentukan Undang-Undang Pokok Agraria, Isi dan Pelaksanaannya, Jilid I. Jakarta: Djambatan, 2008.

Hutagalung, Arie Sukanti. Program Landreform di Indonesia. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada, 2005.

Koeswahyono, Imam, et al. Sosio Legal: Bekal Pengantar dan Substansi Pendalaman. Malang: Intimedia, 2014.

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana, 2016.

Moleong, Lexy J. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif, Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Remaja Rosdakarya, 2010.

Rahardjo, Satjipto. Ilmu Hukum. Bandung: PT Citra Aditya Bakti, 2004.

Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971.

Santoso, Urip. Hukum Agraria: Kajian Komprehensif. Jakarta: Kencana, 2017.

Sitorus, Oloan, and H.M. Zaki Sierrad. Hukum Agraria di Indonesia: Konsep Dasar dan Implementasi. Yogyakarta: Mitra Kebijakan Tanah Indonesia, 2006.

Soekanto, Soerjono. Efektivitas Hukum dan Peranan Sanksi. Bandung: Remadja Karya, 1988.

Soekanto, Soerjono. Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Penegakan Hukum. Jakarta: PT RajaGrafindo Persada, 1993.

Sumardjono, Maria S.W. Kebijakan Pertanahan: Antara Regulasi dan Implementasi. Jakarta: Penerbit Buku Kompas, 2006.

Supriadi. Hukum Agraria. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2010.

Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia of 1945.

Law No. 5 of 1960 on the Basic Agrarian Regulation (Undang-Undang Pokok Agraria).

Law No. 56 Prp of 1960 on the Determination of Agricultural Land Area.

Government Regulation No. 224 of 1961 on the Implementation of Land Distribution and the Provision of Compensation.

Government Regulation No. 41 of 1964 on Amendments and Additions to Government Regulation No. 224 of 1961.

Government Regulation No. 4 of 1977 on the Absentee (Guntai) Ownership of Agricultural Land by Retired Civil Servants.

Regulation of the Minister of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning/Head of the National Land Agency No. 18 of 2016 on the Control of Agricultural Land Tenure.

Presidential Regulation No. 177 of 2024 on the National Land Agency.

Downloads

Published

2026-11-03

How to Cite

The Role of The ATR/BPN Office in the Implementation of the Prohibition on Absentee Land Ownership (A Study in Mentaya Hilir Selatan Sub-District, Kotawaringin Timur Regency). (2026). International Journal of Social Science Research and Review, 9(11), 101–111. https://doi.org/10.47814/jtc9wc84

Most read articles by the same author(s)