An In-Depth Analysis on the Use of AI in Market Dynamics to Reduce Asymmetric Information
Case Study of Amazon and Swiggy
Abstract
Information asymmetry within consumer markets relies on the mechanism of knowledge being manifest in only one party, with a cost to the other to attain that same information. The economic theories and observations apparent in markets have been modelled to a great extent by different economists to not only cover the causation but also the predicted outcome if such imbalance exists, to varying degrees. When adding the capabilities of AI to the use for consumers, we see a dramatic increase in the information a day-to-day person can attain, seeing as traditional factors that once barrier information no longer hold, such as complexity, variety, time etc. Through active exploration of two different platforms, ecommerce Amazon and Indian food delivery platform Swiggy, different AI features and their uses are examined to determine whether they are beneficial in reducing information asymmetry. The capability of AI, as seen on these platforms, actively combats information asymmetry for both consumers and sellers, but at a much faster rate for consumers than sellers. This is because consumer-facing AI features substantially reduce the barriers that traditionally prevented buyers from acquiring and processing information, allowing them to access, compare and interpret information that they previously could not realistically obtain. In contrast, seller-facing AI primarily increases efficiency through the automation and enhancement of existing informational processes, as sellers already possess extensive information regarding their customers, purchases and other aspects of their business. Therefore, AI does not simply eliminate information asymmetry, but instead shifts the balance of informational advantage, with the current effect appearing to favour consumers more substantially than sellers. This creates a further dimension to the understanding of information asymmetry, as the issue is no longer simply whether information is available, but who is able to access, interpret and use it effectively.
References
Akerlof, G. A. (1970). The Market for ‘Lemons’: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84(3), 488–500. www.jstor.org/stable/1879431
Stigler, G. J. (1961). The Economics of Information. The Journal of Political Economy, 69(3), 213–225.www.jstor.org/stable/1829263
Harkness, L., Robinson, K., Stein, E., & Wu, W. (2023, December 5) How Generative AI Can Boost Consumer Marketing. Mckinsey & Company. mckinsey.com/capabilities/growth-marketing-and-sales/our-insights/how-generative-ai-can-boost-consumer-marketing
Grossman, S. J., & Stiglitz, J. E. (1980). On the Impossibility of Informationally Efficient Markets. The American Economic Review, 70(3), 393–408. www.aeaweb.org/aer/top20/70.3.393-408.pdf.
McDonald, A. M., et al. (2008). The Cost of Reading Privacy Policies. I/S: A Journal of Law and Policy for the Information Society. lorrie.cranor.org/pubs/readingPolicyCost-authorDraft.pdf.
Simon, H. A. (1955). A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69(111), 99–118.iiif.library.cmu.edu/file/Simon_box00063_fld04838_bdl0001_doc0001/Simon_box00063_fld04838_bdl0001_doc0001.pdf.
Spence, M. (1973) Job Market Signaling. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355–74.www.jstor.org/stable/1882010
Rothschild, M., & Stiglitz, J. E. (1976) Equilibrium in Competitive Insurance Markets: An Essay on the Economics of Imperfect Information. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 90(4), 629–49. www.uh.edu/~bsorense/Rothschild&Stiglitz.pdf
Resnick, P., Zeckhauser, R., Swanson, J., & Lockwood, K. (2002). The Value of Reputation on eBay: A Controlled Experiment. John F. Kennedy School of Government Harvard University Faculty Research Working Papers Series, rzeckhauser.scholars.harvard.edu/publications/trust-among-strangers-internet-transactions-empirical-analysis-ebays
Luca, M. (2016) Reviews, Reputation, and Revenue: The Case of Yelp.com (Working Paper No. 12-016). Harvard Business School.www.hbs.edu/ris/Publication%20Files/12-016_a7e4a5a2-03f9-490d-b093-8f951238dba2.pdf
Pavlou, P. A., & Dimoka A. (2006) The Nature and Role of Feedback Text Comments in Online Marketplaces: Implications for Trust Building, Price Premiums, and Seller Differentiation.” Information Systems Research, 17(4), 392–414. doi.org/10.1287/isre.1060.0106
Akerlof, G. A., & Shiller, R. J. (2015) Phishing for Phools: The Economics of Manipulation and Deception. Princeton University Press, 1-57.
Nobel Prize Outreach. (2026, July). Popular Information. www.nobelprize.org/prizes/economic-sciences/2001/popular-information
Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2014) The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in the Time of Brilliant Technologies. W.W. Norton, 57-95.digamo.free.fr/brynmacafee2.pdf
Agrawal, A., Gans, J. S., & Goldfarb, A. (2018). Prediction machines: The simple economics of artificial intelligence. Harvard Business Review Press.cdn.chools.in/DIG_LIB/E-Book/Prediction%20Machines-The%20Simple%20Economics%20of%20Artificial%20Intelligence%20by%20Ajay%20Agrawal_.pdf
OpenAI. (2023, March 27) GPT-4 Technical Report. 1-13. cdn.openai.com/papers/gpt-4.pdf
Acemoglu, D., & Johnson, S. (2023) Power and Progress : Our Thousand-year Struggle Over Technology and Prosperity. Hachette Book Group, 305-346
Dell’Acqua, F., McFowland, K. E. , III, Mollick, E., Lifshitz-Assaf D., Kellogg K., & Rajendran, S. (2023). Navigating the jagged technological frontier: Field experimental evidence of the effects of AI on knowledge work productivity and quality (Working Paper No. 24-013). Harvard Business School.
mitsloan.mit.edu/sites/default/files/2023-10/SSRN-id4573321.pdf
Amazon.com Services, Inc. (2019). An Amazon designed for your business. Amazon Business. https://business.amazon.com/assets/global/images/blogs/documents/infographics/AMZ_Comparsion_Infographic_19_Final.pdf
The Harris Poll. (2026, April 13). 75% of Americans say they would lose trust in AI shopping if results were sponsored. PR Newswire.prnewswire.com/news-releases/75-of-americans-say-they-would-lose-trust-in-ai-shopping-if-results-were-sponsored-302739901.html?_sp=b5cd2c10-25ad-44d8-bdd1-ec77f4b9bd04.1786006495655
Doer, A. (2025, November 14). You can now shop what you see using AI-powered Amazon’s Lens Live. Amazon News.aboutamazon.com/news/retail/search-image-amazon-lens-live-shopping-rufus
Amazon.com, Inc. (2026). News release details: Amazon.com announces second quarter results. In Amazon Investor Relations. https://s2.q4cdn.com/299287126/files/doc_earnings/2026/q2/earnings-result/AMZN-Q2-2026-Earnings-Release.pdf
Rao, M. (2024, December 31). Generative AI journey: A peek into the future. Swiggy Diaries.blog.swiggy.com/news/swiggys-generative-ai-journey-a-peek-into-the-future
Swiggy. (2026, May 8). Swiggy’s Food Delivery GOV Grew 22.6% YoY with INR 1,000 Cr in Adjusted EBITDA; Overall Revenue Surges 45% to INR 6,383 Cr; Losses Narrow by INR 281 Cr YoY Swiggy. https://www.swiggy.com/corporate/press-release/swiggys-food-delivery-gov-grew-22-6-yoy-with-inr-1000-cr-in-adjusted-ebitda-overall-revenue-surges-45-to-inr-6383-cr-losses-narrow-by-inr-281-cr-yoy/
Sengupta, R., & Ai, E. E. (2025, October 28). How Swiggy’s AI knows you’re craving biryani before you even open the app. ETEnterpriseai.com. https://enterpriseai.economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/case-studies/unleashing-ai-how-swiggy-knows-your-biryani-cravings-before-you-do/124853621
Communications Team & Swiggy. (2023, November 3). The Power of Pictures: Elevate Your Menu with the New AI-Fuelled Photoshoot Feature. Swiggy Diaries. https://blog.swiggy.com/swiggy-catalyst/the-power-of-pictures-elevate-your-menu-with-the-new-ai-fuelled-photoshoot-feature/
Cooley, A. A. (2026, May 29). How demand forecasting drives smarter inventory decisions. Amazon Business. business.amazon.com/en/blog/demand-forecasting
Nadel, D. (n.d.). The principles powering Amazon’s innovation for sellers. Amazon Selling Partners. sellingpartners.aboutamazon.com/the-principles-powering-amazons-innovation-for-sellers
Authors retain copyright of their published work and grant the International Journal of Social Science Research and Review (IJSSRR) the right of first publication.
Articles published in IJSSRR are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited.
Authors are permitted to share, archive, and distribute the published version of their work, provided that proper acknowledgement of the original publication in IJSSRR is given.