The Voice Premium Index: Measuring the Returns to Debate and Public Speaking Among Students

  • Prabhav Kautickwar Ridge High School, India
Keywords: Communication Skills; Debate Participation; Human Capital; Public Speaking; Voice Premium Index

Abstract

Communication skills are an important component of human capital and can influence students’ academic, social, and future professional development. This study introduces the Voice Premium Index (VPI), a composite measure developed to assess the broader benefits associated with debate and public speaking participation. The index captures six dimensions: communication clarity, persuasion ability, leadership in discussions, confidence in public speaking, critical thinking, and opportunity access. Using primary survey data from students in India and the United States, the study examines the association between debate participation and communication-related outcomes. The analysis employs reliability testing, descriptive statistics, correlation analysis, independent-samples t-tests, and multiple regression. The results indicate that the VPI has strong internal consistency and that students with debate experience report higher VPI scores than students without such experience. Debate engagement is positively associated with VPI, while academic performance also shows a significant relationship with the index. Communication confidence and leadership are closely associated with overall VPI scores, suggesting that the benefits of communication-focused activities extend beyond speaking ability alone. Demographic characteristics do not show significant differences in VPI within the sample. The study contributes to the literature by framing communication-related competencies as a measurable component of human capital and by proposing the VPI as a composite approach to assessing the outcomes of debate and public speaking. The findings support greater consideration of structured communication activities within student development and educational programs.

References

Amin, R. I., Safiyah, A., Paul, M. E., Arham, A. F., Hassan, N. H., Nurwina Akmal Anuar, Mohd, Othman, N. K., Mohd, Rahim, A. A., & Salleh, A. R. (2024). Debating as an academic tool: Fostering holistic and critical thinking in higher education. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 13(4), 1722–1730. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v13-i4/23617
Bharadiya, J. (2023). The impact of artificial intelligence on business processes. European Journal of Technology, 7(2), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.47672/ejt.1488
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. In Research Gate. Prentice-Hall. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235701029_Experiential_Learning_Experience_As_The_Source_Of_Learning_And_Development
Lu, Z., & Mohamed, H. B. (2025). The effects of collaborative argumentation on learning engagement and critical thinking: An empirical study of processes and outcomes. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, IX(VIII), 3476–3486. https://doi.org/10.47772/ijriss.2025.908000282
McAlister, S., Ravenscroft, A., & Scanlon, E. (2004). Combining interaction and context design to support collaborative argumentation using a tool for synchronous CMC. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20(3), 194–204. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2004.00086.x
National Association of Colleges and Employers. (2025). Career readiness program development and validation. https://www.naceweb.org/docs/default-source/default-document-library/2025/career-readiness/nace-career-readiness-development-and-validation-december-2025.pdf?sfvrsn=1e53c2b6_3
National Speech & Debate Association. (n.d.). In National Speech & Debate Association. Retrieved August 10, 2026, from https://www.speechanddebate.org/
Rapanta, C., & Macagno, F. (2019). Evaluation and Promotion of Argumentative Reasoning Among University Students: The Case of Academic Writing. Revista Lusófona de Educação, (45), 125–142. https://doi.org/10.24140/issn.1645-7250.rle45.09
Sanders, J. A., Wiseman, R. L., & Gass, R. H. (1994). Does teaching argumentation facilitate critical thinking? Communication Reports, 7(1), 27–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/08934219409367580
van Gelder, T. (2015). Using argument mapping to improve critical thinking skills. The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Thinking in Higher Education, 183–192. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137378057_12
Published
2026-10-05
How to Cite
Kautickwar, P. (2026). The Voice Premium Index: Measuring the Returns to Debate and Public Speaking Among Students. International Journal of Social Science Research and Review, 9(10), 163–176. https://doi.org/10.47814/ijssrr.v9i10.3639