Bridging Progress and Parity: A Critical Review of Digital Development and the Global Digital Divide

  • Anjan Hatuwal School of Computing and Engineering, University of West London, United Kingdom
Keywords: Digital Divide, Digital Development, Inclusive Design, Digital Inclusion, Technologital Innovation, Policy, Global IT

Abstract

The fast pace of digital development has unleashed unprecedented technological innovations such as the deployment of 5G networks, advancements in artificial intelligence (AI), and the widespread adoption of cloud and edge computing. This period of digital development is also accompanied by ongoing and evolving challenges to universal access to technology. This discussion examines the complex interaction between digital development and the digital divide. Here, it not only examines the potential for economic opportunity, increased civic participation, and better access to services but also the adverse effects when technological advancement leaves behind marginalised communities. The study reformulates root concepts of digital inclusion, following the development of the digital divide from inequality in access to physical hardware to complex problems involving digital literacy, affordability, and the quality of connectivity. By bringing together economic theory, ethical argument, and technical analysis, this review analyses empirical research and case studies from the Global South and North. New dimensions emerge from an examination of cutting-edge approaches-comprising inclusive design, adaptive governance, and participatory research techniques-that aim to achieve a balance between innovation and equality. This review demands a two-pronged approach in the form of fast-track digital progress that also addresses, simultaneously and strongly, bridging the digital divides. The report ends with policy implementation advice and a potential research agenda, emphasising the need for long-term research and flexible digital techniques to guarantee that technological advancements have beneficial effects across all areas of society.

References

European Commission. (2022). The Web Accessibility Directive. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/web-accessibility.

GSMA. (2023). Mobile Economy Report 2023. GSMA Intelligence.

Heeks, R. (2021). From Digital Divide to Digital Justice in the Global South: Conceptualising Adverse Digital Incorporation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.09783.

ITU. (2023). Measuring Digital Development: Facts and Figures. International Telecommunication Union.

Reuters. (2024). Together We Can End the Digital Divide That Disenfranchises 2.6 billion People. Retrieved from https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/society-equity/.

Sanders, M., & Scanlon, D. (2021). Digital Literacy and the Modern Divide: A Comprehensive Study. Journal of Digital Society, 8(2), 150–171.

Sieck, C. J., Sheon, A., Ancker, J. S., Castek, J., & Callahan, B. (2021). Digital Inclusion as a Social Determinant of Health. npj Digital Medicine.

Treviranus, J. (2018). Digital Convergence and Inclusive Design. In Emerging Trends in Digital Innovation. Routledge.

UNESCO. (2021). Education and the Digital Divide: Report on Global Digital Literacy. UNESCO Institute for Statistics.

World Bank. (2022). World Development Report: Digital Dividends. World Bank.

World Economic Forum. (2022). Digital Transformation Initiative: Unlocking Economic Potential. World Economic Forum.

Published
2025-06-05
How to Cite
Hatuwal, A. (2025). Bridging Progress and Parity: A Critical Review of Digital Development and the Global Digital Divide. International Journal of Social Science Research and Review, 8(6), 74-85. https://doi.org/10.47814/ijssrr.v8i6.2654