Homelessness and Poverty in Phoenix, Arzona, USA: Reimagining the Church
Abstract
Homelessness is a complex issue with multifaceted causes and global implications. Factors such as wars, genecides, and immgration contributes sgnificantly to homelessness, especially in European nations and the United States. A doctoral study conducted in Phoenix, Arizona found that dispite increasing efforts and resources to reduce homelessness and poverty, the homeless population remains a concern. The study sought to inspire hope in those facing homelessness and poverty by examining both historical and current ministry approaches in Phoenix and evaluating them against biblical principles to understand their theological significance. It used a combination of Apprecation Inquiry and Browning research methods and incoporated a mixed qualitatve and quantitative approach, gathering data through questionnaires, interviews, and focus group discussions with forty-six participants who agreed to participate in the study. These participants included leaders from churches, para-church organizations, homeless individuals, and the working poor. The findings indicate that personal interaction, particularly when people are heard and prayed for, plays a crucial role in fostering hope and encouragement. The study highlighted the importance of ministries focusing on real needs of the poor, advocating for a move from transactional to transformative approaches. It also suggested that collaborative efforts among ministries--providing counseling, job training, support, and prayer-- are key to creating hope and mprovng the quality of life for those living in poverty.
References
Bagley, G. (2023). Homelessness and poverty in Phoenix, Arizona, in the United States of America, and a theology of hope: Rethinking the Church. PhD thesis submitted at the South African Theological Seminary, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Bloor, J. (2015). Revisiting Wesley’s ethics and his ministry to the
poor: Social, economical, and medical solutions. Wesleyan Theological
Journal, 50 (2) (Fall 2015), 80–95.
Boloje, B. O. (2019). Economic piracy and land confiscation (Micah 2:1-5): Micah’s portrayal of evildoers, Evil-doing, and Yahweh’s action. Journals for Semitics, 28(1), 1–15. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.25159/2663-6573/5650.
Browning, D. (1996). A fundamental practical theology. Minneapolis: Fortress.
Cooperrider, D., & D. Whitney (2004). A positive revolution in change: Appreciative Inquiry. Retrieved fromhttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/237404587_A_Positive_Revolution_in_Change_ Appreciative_Inquiry.
Finn, R. (2006). Almsgiving in the later Roman empire: Christian promotion and practice. 313–450. USA: Oxford University Press.
Forrest, R. (1999). The new landscape of precariousness. In Patricia Kennett and Alex Marsh (eds). Homelessness: Exploring the new terrain. 17–36. Bristol: The Policy Press.
Gottwald, N. K. (2014). Abusing the Bible: The case of Deuteronomy 15. Review and Expositor, 111(2),196–198.
Hammond, S. A. (2103). The thin book of Appreciative Inquiry. 3rd ed. Bend: Thin Book.
Hanson, K., & D. Oakman (2013). Palestine in the time of Jesus: Social structures and social conflicts. 2nd ed. Minneapolis: Fortress.
Hoppe, L. J. (2004). There shall be no poor among you: Poverty in the Bible, Nashville: Abingdon.
Jennings, T. Jr. (1989). Wesley’s preferential options for the poor. Quarterly Review, 9 (3), 10–29.
Korten, D. C. (1990). Getting to the 21st Century: Voluntary action and the global agenda. West Hartfield: Kumarian Press.
Martyr, J. (2015). The first apology of Justin. Translated by Markus Dods and George Reith. Retrieved from https://files.romanroadsstatic.com/materials/romans/earlychristianity/Justin%20MartyV1-0.pdf.
Minnery, J., & E. Greenhalgh (2007). Approaches to homelessness policy in Europe, the United States, and Australia. Journal of Social Issues, 63(3),641–655.
Meeks, D. (1995). The portion of the poor: Good news poor in the Wesleyan tradition. Nashville: Kingswood Books.
Ndukwe, O. (2008). Christian faith and social transformation: John Howard Yoder’s social ethics as lens for revisioning the ecclesiological identity of the South-Central Synod (SCS) of the Presbyterian Church of Nigeria (The PCN). PhD thesis, Stellenbosch University.
Noel, E. S. (2017). Land grabs, unjust exchange, and bribes: Economic opportunism and the rights of the poor in Ancient Israel. Southwestern Journal of Theology, 59(2),183–199.
Pillay, J. (2017). The church as a transformation and change agent. HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies 73(3), 1–12, https://doi.org/10.4102/hts. v73i3.4352.
Powell, C., Perrier, R., & D le Roux. (2021). Sharing the table: Reflections on the engagement of faith-based communities with homelessness in three South African cities.” In Stephen DeBeer & R. Vally (eds) Facing Homelessness: Finding inclusionary, collaborative solutions. (pp. 223-253). Cape Town: AOSIS Books.
Swart, I., & Venter, D. (2000). NGOs, churches and the challenge of fourth generation people-centered development strategies in South Africa.” Scriptura 75(4), 449–464. https://doi.org/10.7833/75-0-1267.
Torvend, S. (2008). Luther and the hungry poor: Gathered fragments. Minneapolis: Fortress.
Tuininga, M. J. (2014). Good news for the poor: An analysis of Calvin’s concept of poor relief and the diaconate in light of his two kingdoms paradigm. Calvin Theological Journal, 49(2),221–247. Grand Rapids: Calvin Theological Seminary.
Tuininga, M. J. (2016.) (Oct.). “Why Calvin had good news for the poor.” The Gospel coalition. Retrieved from https://www.thegospelcoalition.org/article/why-calvin-had-good-news-for-the-poor/.
Tertullian. (1709) The apology of Tertullian chapt.39. Translated by William Reeve. Retrieved from https://www.tertullian.org/articles/reeve_apology.htm.
United States Department of Housing and Urban Development. 2015. The 2015 Annual Homeless Assessment Report to Congress. October 2015. Retrieved from https://www.huduser.gov/portal/sites/default/files/pdf/2015-AHAR-Part-2.pdf.
Van Eck, E. (2016). The parables of Jesus the Galilean: Stories of a social prophet. Vol. 9. Wipf and Stock Publishers.
Wearing, B. (1996). Gender: The pain and pleasure of difference. Melbourne: Longman.
Who Are the Homeless People of America? 2015. Retrieved from https://hubpages.com/politics/who-are-the-homelss-peope-in-the-United-States%20-of-America.
Woodbridge, N., & S. Joynt (2019). A sixfold biblical approach to social transformation in the local community in terms of the ELLIJAH model: A challenge for today’s church. Verbum et Ecclesia 40(1) 1998. https://doi.org/10.4102/ve.v40i1.1988.
Wright, S. I. (2015). Jesus the storyteller. Louisville; Westminster John Knox.
Copyright (c) 2025 Abraham Modisa Mkhondo Mzondi, Curtis Glen Bagley
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright for this article is retained by the author(s), with first publication rights granted to the journal. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
