The Privacy Paradox in Personalised Advertising: Insights from Demographic and Behavioural Data in Delhi NCR

  • Shivam Chaudhary Pathways School Gurgaon, India
Keywords: Personalised Advertising, Targeted Marketing, Data Falsification, Data Privacy

Abstract

Personalised advertising, which individually pushes content based on the users’ consumer data has become a main feature of modern digital marketing across platforms such as Instagram and Amazon. As its prevalence increases, understanding consumer perceptions of personalisation has become increasingly vital. While existing research has predominantly focused on Western contexts and has typically examined either privacy concerns or the effects of personalisation in isolation, limited attention has been paid to the interplay between demographic characteristics, privacy attitudes and perceived advertising value; particularly in under-researched regions. This study investigates consumer perception on personalised advertising, focusing on the role of privacy concerns, demographic variables (gender, age, internet experience) and perceived advertising value. Additionally, it explores whether these factors influence trust and behavioural responses towards targeted advertising. Employing a quantitative survey design, data was collected from 100 participants using standardised 5-point Likert scales. The findings indicate that female and younger participants reported higher levels of infotainment and more favourable attitudes toward personalised advertising, although younger respondents also experienced higher levels of advertising irritation. Participants who reported falsifying personal data demonstrated marginally elevated irritation levels. Notably, privacy concerns were consistently high across all demographic groups. These findings suggest that while personalised ads may engage certain user groups more strongly, widespread privacy skepticism continues to pose a significant barrier to consumer trust and acceptance. Ethical, transparent data practices and clearer privacy regulations are recommended to foster trust and further acceptance of personalised advertising strategies.

References

Adams, P. (2024a, September 26). Forrester: Online ad tolerance rises while trust remains low. Marketing Dive.https://www.marketingdive.com/news/forrester-consumer-online-advertising-tolerance-marketing-to-gen-z/728177/

Adams, P. (2024b, September 26). Forrester: Online ad tolerance rises while trust remains low. Marketing Dive.https://www.marketingdive.com/news/forrester-consumer-online-advertising-tolerance-marketing-to-gen-z/728177/

Adams, P. (2024c, September 26). Forrester: Online ad tolerance rises while trust remains low. Marketing Dive.https://www.marketingdive.com/news/forrester-consumer-online-advertising-tolerance-marketing-to-gen-z/728177/

Adams, P. (2024d, September 26). Forrester: Online ad tolerance rises while trust remains low. Marketing Dive.https://www.marketingdive.com/news/forrester-consumer-online-advertising-tolerance-marketing-to-gen-z/728177/

Carufel, R., & Carufel, R. (2025, March 9). New research reveals perceptions of ad effectiveness by age - Agility PR Solutions. Agility PR Solutions - Media Relations. . . Streamlined. https://www.agilitypr.com/pr-news/marketing-news/new-research-reveals-perceptions-of-ad-effectiveness-by-age/

Commisso, D. (2024, January 18). Digital ads continue to become more ‘Relevant’ to consumers, especially Gen Z - CivicScience. CivicScience. https://civicscience.com/digital-ads-continue-to-become-more-relevant-to-consumers/

Dai, Y., Zhu, Z., & Guo, W. Y. (2025). The impact of advertising on women’s self-perception: a systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1430079

Deslée, A., & Cloarec, J. (2024). Safeguarding Privacy: Ethical Considerations in Data-Driven Marketing. In Emerald Publishing Limited eBooks (pp. 147–161). https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-83753-686-320241009

Fernandes, J. (2024a, October 21). Advertising by age: Platforms and content that influence consumer behaviour.https://business.yougov.com/content/50751-advertising-by-age-platforms-and-content-that-influence-consumer-behaviour

Fernandes, J. (2024b, October 21). Advertising by age: Platforms and content that influence consumer behaviour.https://business.yougov.com/content/50751-advertising-by-age-platforms-and-content-that-influence-consumer-behaviour

Hegde, P., & Devadiga, A. (2024). A study on ethical & privacy concerns in digital marketing. In Priya Sequiera & Alvas Institute of Engineering & Technology, 5th International Conference on New Age Marketing [Conference-proceeding]. https://www.sdmimd.ac.in/marketingconference2024/papers/IMC2478.pdf

How to avoid the growing ad irritation | WARC. (n.d.). https://www.warc.com/content/paywall/article/how-to-avoid-the-growing-ad-irritation/en-gb/en-GB/142636?

Iftikhar, S. M. (2024). A Critical Review of Personalization in Digital Marketing: Psychological, Technological and Ethical Perspectives. Technological and Ethical Perspectives (August 15, 2024).

Jansen, B. J., Moore, K., Carman, S., & College of Information Sciences and Technology, The Pennsylvania State University, United States. (2012). Evaluating the performance of demographic targeting using gender in sponsored search. In Information Processing and Management [Journal-article]. Elsevier Ltd. https://faculty.ist.psu.edu/jjansen/academic/jansen_gender_ppc.pdf

Karami, A., Shemshaki, M., & Ghazanfar, M. (2024). Exploring the Ethical Implications of AI-Powered Personalization in Digital Marketing. Data Intelligence, In-Press.

Khatak, T., & Mehandi, F. (2024). Understanding the Data Privacy concerns of Consumers on Personalised Marketing Strategies. School of Economics and Journalism; Lund University. https://lup.lub.lu.se/luur/download?func=downloadFile&recordOId=9166219&fileOId=9166222

Levin, A., Privacy and Cyber Crime Institute, & Foster, M. (2021). Privacy, targeted advertising & social media: how big a concern? Some disconcerting observations. In Privacy and Cyber Crime Institute. https://www.ourcommons.ca/content/Committee/411/ETHI/WebDoc/WD5706433/411_ETHI_PSM_Briefs/LevinAvnerE.pdf

Parasrampuria, A., & Williams, K. (2023). Ethical considerations and societal impact of personalized advertising algorithms. Journal of Student Research, 12(4). https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v12i4.5910

Statista. (2025, June 27). Consumers finding ads on selected media irritating in the U.S. 2023, by generation. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1478604/irritating-media-advertising-opinion-generation-united-states/

Taylor, D. G., Davis, D. F., & Jillapalli, R. (2009). Privacy concern and online personalization: The moderating effects of information control and compensation. Electronic commerce research, 9, 203-223.

Urlage, J. (2021). Women in Advertising. Ipsos. https://www.ipsos.com/en-us/knowledge/media-brand-communication/women-advertising

Vinerean, S., Cetina, I., Dumitrescu, L., & Tichindelean, M. (2013). The effects of social media marketing on online consumer behavior. International Journal of Business and Management, 8(14). https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v8n14p66

Wang, H. J., Yue, X. L., Ansari, A. R., Tang, G. Q., Ding, J. Y., & Jiang, Y. Q. (2022). Research on the influence mechanism of consumers’ perceived risk on the advertising avoidance behavior of online targeted advertising. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.878629

Published
2025-08-12
How to Cite
Chaudhary, S. (2025). The Privacy Paradox in Personalised Advertising: Insights from Demographic and Behavioural Data in Delhi NCR. International Journal of Social Science Research and Review, 8(7), 499-508. https://doi.org/10.47814/ijssrr.v8i7.2822