School Heads’ Instructional Supervision in Relation to Teachers’ Satisfaction and Work Performance

  • Sittie Ainah A. AMPASO Macmac Graduate School, Misamis University, H.T. Feliciano St. Aguada, Ozamiz City, Misamis Occidental, Philippines
  • Cynthia S. Superable Misamis University, H.T. Feliciano St. Aguada, Ozamiz City, Misamis Occidental, Philippines
Keywords: Instructional Supervision; Teacher Satisfaction; Work Performance; School Leadership; Professional Development Training

Abstract

Education is globally recognized as a key driver of social and economic development, as it equips individuals with the knowledge, skills, and values necessary for personal and professional growth. This study examined the relationship between school heads’ instructional supervision, teacher satisfaction, and teachers’ work performance in the Tubod District, Division of Lanao del Norte. A descriptive-correlational research design was employed, involving 120 teachers selected through stratified random sampling. Data were collected using two researcher-made questionnaires measuring instructional supervision and teacher satisfaction, while teachers’ work performance was assessed through documentary analysis of the Department of Education Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form (IPCRF). Descriptive statistics, including mean and standard deviation, were used to determine the levels of the variables, and Pearson Product-Moment Correlation was utilized to test the significant relationships among them. The findings revealed that instructional supervision by school heads was very satisfactory, teacher satisfaction was very high, and teachers’ work performance was very satisfactory. Significant relationships were found between instructional supervision and teacher satisfaction, as well as between instructional supervision and work performance, particularly in observation, feedback, and mentoring; however, professional support did not show a significant relationship with work performance. The study concludes that effective instructional supervision enhances teacher satisfaction and work performance and recommends strengthening supervisory practices, supportive policies, professional development initiatives, and continuous research to sustain educational improvement.

References

Adlawan, M. M., & Quines, L. A. (2025). Instructional leadership of school heads, workplace spirituality, and school climate: A causal model on teacher engagement in public schools. European Journal of Education Studies.https://oapub.org/edu/index.php/ejes/article/download/5841/8468

Arcilla, M. E. P. (2024). Instructional feedback practices and teacher job satisfaction. International

Journal of Open-Access Interdisciplinary Educational Research.

https://etcor.org/storage/iJOINED/Vol.%20IV%281%29%2C%20658-668.pdf

Asmuri, N. A. B. (2022). The relationship between headmaster instructional leadership and teacher job

satisfaction. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research.

https://www.atlantis-press.com/article/125976612.pdf

Cabaron, G. J., & Oco, R. M. (2023). Teachers’ level of motivation and job satisfaction. Asian Journal of

Education and Social Studies, 45(1), 1-9.https://community.sent2promo.com/id/eprint/1469/

Collie, R. J. (2021). COVID-19 and teachers’ somatic burden, stress, and emotional exhaustion: Examining the role of principal leadership and workplace buoyancy. AERA Open, 7, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858420986187

Castillo, R. C. C. (2025). Instructional supervision and teachers’ job performance. International Journal

of Scientific and Management Research.

https://scimatic.org/storage/journals/11/pdfs/6294.pdf

Day, C., & Gu, Q. (2020). The new lives of teachers. Routledge. Department of Education. (2023). Basic education report 2023. Department of Education, Philippines.

Guo, H., Alias, B. S., & Mamud, M. I. (2024). Principal instructional leadership and teacher job

satisfaction: The role of school climate. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research.https://www.ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter/article/download/12841/pdf

Hallinger, P. (2022). Instructional leadership and school improvement: A review of empirical research 2010–2021. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 50(6), 957–977. https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432221080601

He, P., Guo, F., & Abazie, G. A. (2024). School principals’ instructional leadership as a predictor of teacher’s professional development. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 9(1), 63.https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40862-024-00290-0

Honculada, M. (2023). Teachers’ perceptions on instructional supervisory practices. Department of Education.https://tangub.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Honculada_Completed-Research_Tangub_BERF2023.pdf

Lacaza, J. L., & Dioso, E. D. (2025). School principals’ instructional leadership behavior and job satisfaction of teachers: A correlation. International Journal of Interdisciplinary Viewpoints.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/394580199

Leithwood, K. (2021). A review of evidence about equitable school leadership. Education Sciences, 11(8), 377. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11080377

Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2021). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership revisited. School Leadership & Management, 41(1–2), 5–22. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13632434.2019.1596077

Toropova, A., Myrberg, E., & Johansson, S. (2021). Teacher job satisfaction: The importance of school working conditions and teacher characteristics. Educational Review, 73(1), 71–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2019.1705247

Published
2026-06-06
How to Cite
Macmac, S. A. A., & Superable, C. S. (2026). School Heads’ Instructional Supervision in Relation to Teachers’ Satisfaction and Work Performance. International Journal of Social Science Research and Review, 9(6), 74-88. https://doi.org/10.47814/ijssrr.v9i6.3350