The Triadic Stool Model

A Framework for Sustainable Peace and State Building Accountable Governance, Professional Security, and Independent Justice as Interdependent Pillars of Stability

  • Abdullahi Mohamed Hersi PhD, Adjunct Professor, Youngstown State University, Ohio, United States
Keywords: Triadic Stool Model, Sustainable Peace, State Building, Accountable Governance, Professional Security, Independent Justice, Structural Foundation, Triadic Synchronization, Fragile States, Peacebuilding, Conflict Resolution, Equitable Economy, Environmental Sustainability, Natural Resource Management, Policy Framework

Abstract

In spite of extensive international intervention, investment and institution-building over several decades, lasting peace continues to be a distant dream for large parts of the world. This paper presents the "Triadic Stool Model" -- a conceptual framework based on the idea that there are three interconnected pillars for building sustainable peace and a functioning state: (1) good Governance and Rule of Law, (2) Security and Justice, and (3) economic foundations and resource management. The model is based on the image of a three-legged stool, which indicates that stability will only occur if all three legs are able to carry equal weights. If one leg of the stool is lengthened, weakened or eliminated, the entire structure will topple. The innovative element of the Triadic Stool Model lies in its emphasis on triadic synchronization. As opposed to hierarchical or sequential progression in the development of governance, security and economic development, the model asserts that governance, security and economic development must progress in relative harmony. Over-investment in security without reforming governance leads to authoritarian stability. Reforming governance without providing economic opportunities results in hollow democracies. Economic growth without a rule of law enables kleptocracy. Each leg of the stool creates virtuous or vicious circles in which either reinforce or undermine each other's ability to promote peace or instability in a country.  The framework is tested using five comparative case studies: Somalia, where all three legs of the stool are weak, yet international focus is disproportionately directed towards security; South Sudan, where elite capture has resulted in hollowed-out governance and economics, thus rendering security a means of political dominance; Nigeria, where patronage networks have enabled vast economic resources to be diverted from providing benefit to the majority of Nigerians due to failed governance structures; Afghanistan, where institutions built with external scaffolding fell simultaneously upon withdrawal of external support; and Colombia, where the 2016 peace agreement represents the greatest effort to date in terms of attempting triadic synchronization however implementation gaps remain in rural security and economics threatening the durability of the agreement. In addition to presenting a model of peace building, the paper suggests developing a Triadic Synchronization Index (TSI) designed to measure not just how strong each leg of the stool is independently but also how balanced each leg is. Furthermore, the paper includes a number of early warning signs for potential imbalances between each leg of the stool and an accompanying matrix detailing specific policy recommendations for policymakers, donors and civil society organizations working to establish sustainable peace.

References

Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2019). The narrow corridor: States, societies, and the fate of liberty. Penguin Press.

African Union. (2023). Report on the transition from AMISOM to ATMIS: Challenges and prospects for the security transition in Somalia. African Union Peace and Security Council.

Atlantic Council. (2024). Colombia's peace process at a crossroads: Security challenges and implementation gaps eight years after the accord. Atlantic Council Adrienne Arsht Latin America Center.

Autesserre, S. (2019). The crisis of peacekeeping: Why the UN can't end wars. Foreign Affairs, 98(1), 101–116.

Barfield, T. (2022). Afghanistan: A cultural and political history (2nd ed.). Princeton University Press.

Collier, P. (2015). The plundered planet: Why we must and how we can manage nature for global prosperity. Oxford University Press.

Collier, P., & Hoeffler, A. (2004). Greed and grievance in civil war. Oxford Economic Papers, 56(4), 563–595.

De Waal, A. (2015). The real politics of the Horn of Africa: Money, war and the business of power. Polity Press.

Freedom House. (2024). Freedom in the world 2024: The global expansion of authoritarian rule. Freedom House.

Fukuyama, F. (2015). Political order and political decay: From the Industrial Revolution to the globalization of democracy. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

Fund for Peace. (2024). Fragile States Index annual report 2024. The Fund for Peace.

Harpviken, K. B. (2025). Afghanistan after the Republic: Governance, legitimacy, and the limits of external state building. Journal of Peace Research, 62(1), 45–62.

Homer Dixon, T. F. (1999). Environment, scarcity, and violence. Princeton University Press.

International Crisis Group. (2022). Nigeria: Stemming the tide of violence in the northwest (Report No. 315). International Crisis Group.

International Crisis Group. (2023). South Sudan's transition: Overcoming the implementation crisis (Report No. 324). International Crisis Group.

Kroc Institute for International Peace Studies. (2024). Seven years of Final Accord implementation: Perspectives to strengthen peacebuilding at the halfway point (Eighth Comprehensive Report). University of Notre Dame.

Lederach, J. P. (1997). Building peace: Sustainable reconciliation in divided societies. United States Institute of Peace Press.

Lederach, J. P. (2005). The moral imagination: The art and soul of building peace. Oxford University Press.

Mac Ginty, R. (2011). International peacebuilding and local resistance: Hybrid forms of peace. Palgrave Macmillan.

Maxwell, D., Majid, N., Adan, G., Abdirahman, K., & Kim, J. J. (2022). Facing famine: Somali experiences in the famine of 2011 (2nd ed.). Tufts University Feinstein International Center.

Menkhaus, K. (2018). Governance in the hinterland of Africa's weak states: Toward a theory of the mediated state. In S. Hagmann & M. V. Hoehne (Eds.), Comparing Somali governance (pp. 35–56). Cambridge University Press.

Olatunji, F. O., & Osuolale, A. K. (2025). Institutional weakness and cycles of elite impunity in Nigeria's Fourth Republic. African Affairs, 124(494), 112–131.

Paris, R. (2004). At war's end: Building peace after civil conflict. Cambridge University Press.

Richmond, O. P. (2015). The dilemmas of a hybrid peace: Negative or positive? Cooperation and Conflict, 50(1), 50–68.

Rolandsen, Ø. H. (2021). Civil war in South Sudan: From the ceasefire to the crisis. I.B. Tauris.

Sala i Martin, X., & Subramanian, A. (2013). Addressing the natural resource curse: An illustration from Nigeria. Journal of African Economies, 22(4), 570–615.

Sedra, M. (2017). Security sector reform in conflict affected countries: The evolution of a model. Routledge.

Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Knopf.

Shklar, J. N. (1990). The faces of injustice. Yale University Press.

SIGAR (Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction). (2021). What we need to learn: Lessons from twenty years of Afghanistan reconstruction. SIGAR.

Small Arms Survey. (2023). Global violent deaths 2023: Conflict and non conflict contexts. Small Arms Survey.

SIPRI (Stockholm International Peace Research Institute). (2024). SIPRI yearbook 2024: Armaments, disarmament, and international security. Oxford University Press.

Suberu, R. T. (2019). The politics of fiscal federalism in Nigeria: Contending issues and prospects. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 49(3), 426–449.

Transparency International. (2024). Corruption Perceptions Index 2023. Transparency International.

UNDP (United Nations Development Programme). (2023). Human development report 2023/2024: Breaking the gridlock; reimagining cooperation in a polarized world. UNDP.

UNDP. (2024). Human Development Index and its components, statistical annex 2024. UNDP.

UNHCR (United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees). (2024). South Sudan refugee crisis: Global displacement figures. UNHCR.

V Dem Institute. (2024). Democracy report 2024: Democracy winning and losing at the ballot. V Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg.

Williams, P. D. (2018). Fighting for peace in Somalia: A history and analysis of the African Union Mission (AMISOM), 2007–2017. Oxford University Press.

World Bank. (2017). World development report 2017: Governance and the law. World Bank.

World Bank. (2022). Afghanistan development update, October 2022: Adjusting to the new realities. World Bank.

World Bank. (2023). Somalia economic update: Investing in social protection to boost resilience for economic growth. World Bank.

World Bank. (2023). Nigeria poverty assessment 2023: A better future for all Nigerians. World Bank.

Zyla, B. (2025). The Afghan security forces and the failure of externally driven military capacity building. International Peacekeeping, 32(1), 78–99.

Published
2026-06-06
How to Cite
Mohamed Hersi, A. (2026). The Triadic Stool Model. International Journal of Social Science Research and Review, 9(6), 132-152. https://doi.org/10.47814/ijssrr.v9i6.3353