The Crucial Role of Justice Collaborators in the Disclosure of Legal Facts in Corruption Cases

  • Joko Cahyono Doctoral Program in Law, Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia
  • Herman Suryokumoro Doctoral Program in Law, Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia
  • Nurini Aprilianda Doctoral Program in Law, Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia
  • Setiawan Noerdajasakti Doctoral Program in Law, Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia
Keywords: Corruption; Justice Collaborator; Legal Fact; Whistleblowers

Abstract

This study seeks to examine the disclosure of legal facts in cases of corruption through the crucial role of justice collaborator. This study uses a prescriptive normative research type. The research approach uses a statutory approach and a case approach. Based on the interpretation of Article 1 paragraph (1) of Law No. 13 of 2006 in conjunction with Law No. 31 of 2014 concerning Protection of Witnesses and Victims, perpetrator witnesses are in three types of scope, namely as suspects, defendants and convicts. Thus, someone who can be said to be a justice collaborator is the determinant which is regulated in Article 55 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code and in number 9 SEMA No. 04 of 2011 concerning the Treatment of Criminal Whistleblowers (Whistleblowers) and Witnesses of Cooperating Perpetrators (Justice Collaborators). The contribution of the witness of a justice collaborator in uncovering corruption cases is the ability to provide information for other offenders and engage in revealing legal facts.

References

Alatas, S. H. (1987). Korupsi: sifat, sebab dan fungsi. LP3ES-Lembaga Penelitian, Pendidikan dan Penerangan, Ekonomi dan sosial.
Ali, M. (2013). Membumikan Hukum Progresif. Aswaja Pressindo.
Chaerudin, Dinar, S. A., & Fadillah, S. (2008). Strategi pencegahan & penegakan hukum tindak pidana korupsi. Refika Aditama.
Chazawi, A. (2008). Hukum Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Korupsi. PT. Alumni.
Darmadi, S. (1998). Kedudukan ilmu hukum dalam ilmu dan filsafat: sebuah eksplorasi awal menuju ilmu hukum yang integralistik dan otonom. Mandar Maju.
Darmawati, D. (2019). Aspek Hukum Pemenuhan Hak Atas Pembebasan Bersyarat Bagi Narapidana Korupsi. Jurnal Restorative Justice, 3(2), 108–118.
Effendi, T. (2019). Buku Ajar Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Surabaya: Scopindo Media Pustaka.
Gilang, G. Y., Ariman, M. R., & Achmad, R. (2011). Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Tindak Pidana Penghinaan Melalui Lagu Hiphop DISS. Sriwijaya University.
Irianto, S. (2009). Metode Peneltian Hukum: Konstelasi dan Refleksi. Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.
Lexy, J. M. (2005). Metode penelitian kualitatif. Bandung: Rosda Karya.
Manalu, R. Y. (2015). Justice Collaborator Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Lex Crimen, 4(1).
Mertokusumo, S. (2007). Penemuan hukum: Sebuah pengantar.
Moeljatno, S. H. (2002). Asas-asas Hukum Pidana. Rineka Cipta, Jakarta.
Mulyadi, L. (2015). Asas Pembalikan Beban Pembuktian Terhadap Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dalam Sistem Hukum Pidana Indonesia dihubungkan dengan Konvensi Perserikatan Bangsa-Bangsa anti Korupsi 2003. Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 4(1), 101–132.
Musta’in, C. (2017). Tinjauan Hukum Justice Collaborator Sebagai Upaya Pengungkapan Fakta Hukum Kasus Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dalam Persidangan. Universitas Islam Indonesia.
Wahyudi, E. (2021). Forms of Perpetrators of Justice Collaborator in Criminal Acts of Corruption. IN-PROLEGURIT, 1(1), 422–440.
Wijaya, F. (2012). Whistle blowers dan justice collaborator dalam perspektif hukum. Penaku.
Published
2022-12-05
How to Cite
Cahyono, J., Suryokumoro, H., Aprilianda, N., & Noerdajasakti, S. (2022). The Crucial Role of Justice Collaborators in the Disclosure of Legal Facts in Corruption Cases. International Journal of Social Science Research and Review, 5(12), 316-327. https://doi.org/10.47814/ijssrr.v5i12.813